The Principle of Justice and Its Relevance to The Position of The Debtor in The Execution of Fiduciary Guarantees

Yulia Vera Momuat, Ronny A. Maramis, Wulanmas A. P. G. Frederik, Merry E. Kalalo

Abstract


In a contractual relationship, justice means assuring equality in the rights and obligations of parties in an agreement. This study analyzes the nature of justice regarding the position of debtors and creditors in a fiduciary guarantee agreement. The research method used for this study is the normative legal research method. The results of the study show that the nature of justice is important in a fiduciary guarantee agreement, particularly for the fair treatment of debtors and creditors. Justice must be appropriately applied to not harm the debtor and violate their rights. However, creditors also have a right to security over the credit provided; therefore, justice must be applied proportionally and transparently during each stage of the execution of fiduciary security. Due to this, it is important to determine the requirements and consequences of a breach of the debtor's obligations. Additionally, the principle of justice is also related to recognizing the debtor's rights to defend their interests and maintaining a balance between the rights of the debtor and the creditor. In conclusion, justice is an important principle in ensuring the execution of fiduciary guarantee agreements fairly and avoiding abuse or injustice in the process

Full Text:

PDF

References


Badrulzaman, M. D. (1979). Bab-bab Tentang Creditverband, Gadai dan Fidusia [Chapters on Creditverband, Pawn, and Fiduciary]. Alumni.

Dworkin, R. M. (2007). Filsafat Hukum [Philosophy of Law] (Y. Santoso, Trans.). Merkid Press.

Halomoan, J. (2013). Akibat Hukum Bagi Kreditur Terhadap Akta Fidusia Yang Tidak Didaftarkan Ke Kantor Pendaftaran Fidusia Jika Debitur Cidera janji (Studi Kasus Di Bpr Bank Dana Wira Buana) [Legal Consequences for Creditors Regarding Unregistered Fiduciary Acts if Debtors Default (Case Study in Bpr Bank Dana Wira Buana)]. Notarius, 4(1), 50.

Ibrahim, J. (2013). Teori dan Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Normatif [Theory and Methodology of Normative Legal Research], Revised Edition. Bayumedia Publishing.

Irwansyah. (2020). Penelitian Hukum [Legal Research]. Mirra Buana Media.

Isnaeni, H. M. (2016). Pengantar Hukum Jaminan Kebendaan [Introduction to Law of Property Security]. Revka Petra Media.

Khoidin. (2017). Hukum Jaminan: Hak-hak Jaminan, Hak Tanggungan dan Eksekusi Hak Tanggungan [Law of Security: Security Rights, Mortgage Rights, and Execution of Mortgage Rights]. Laksbang Yustitia.

Lomban, E. (2007). The Principle of Equality [Prinsip Kesetaraan]. Leuven.

Marwan, M., & Jimmy, P. (2009). Kamus Hukum [Legal Dictionary]. Surabaya: Reality Publisher.

Marzuki, P. M. (2008). Penelitian Hukum [Legal Research]. Kencana Prenada Media Group.

Plato. (1968). Republic, Book One. In A. A. Ujan (Ed.), Filsafat Hukum [Philosophy of Law] (pp. 1-25). Kanisius.

Rawls, J. (2006). A Theory Of Justice [Teori Keadilan] (U. Fauzan & H. Prasetyo, Trans.). Pustaka Belajar.

Rustam, R. (2017). Hukum Jaminan [Law of Security]. UII Press.

Subekti, R., & Tjitrosudibio, R. (1983). KUH Perdata/Terjemahan [Indonesian Civil Code/Translation]. Pradnya Paramita.

Thain, G. G. (1998). A Basic Outline of The Law of Secured Transaction. In Hukum Jaminan Indonesia [Law of Security in Indonesia], Seri Dasar Hukum Ekonomi 4. Proyek Elips.

Widjaya, I. R. (2008). Merancang Suatu Kontrak Contract Drafting Teori Dan Praktik [Designing a Contract: Contract Drafting Theory and Practice]. Megapoin.

Witanto, D. Y. (2015). Hukum Jaminan Fidusia Dalam Perjanjian Pembiayaan Konsumen (Aspek Perikatan, Pendaftaran dan Eksekusi). Bandung: CV Mandar Maju.

Internet resources:

Turangan, Senewe, Kumendong & Sondakh (2021). The Right to Life Based on Human Rights Principles: A Normative Study of the Death Penalty in Indonesia. AIBPM PUBLISHER Newsletter. Retrieved March 25, 2023, from https://ejournal.aibpmjournals.com/index.php/JCDA/article/view/1095/995.

Aryesam Primus (2023). The Responsibility of Ad Hoc Judges in Deciding Cases of Gross Violations of Human Rights Based on the Principles of Justice. AIBPM PUBLISHER Newsletter. Retrieved March 25, 2023, from https://ejournal.aibpmjournals.com/index.php/JCDA/article/view/2157/1890.

Pontororing , Mawuntu , Sondakh & Waha (2022). Legal Discretion and State Responsibility to Realize Political Human Rights Law for Foreigners Without Documents. AIBPM PUBLISHER Newsletter. Retrieved March 25, 2023, from https://ejournal.aibpmjournals.com/index.php/JCDA/article/view/1798/1661.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.32535/jcda.v6i3.2503

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Copyright (c) 2023 Yulia Vera Momuat

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Journal of The Community Development in Asia (JCDA)

ISSN 2685-8819 (Print) | ISSN 2654-7279 (Online)

DOI Prefix: 10.32535 by CrossRef

Published by AIBPM Publisher

JL. Kahuripan No. 9, Hotel Sahid Montana, Malang, Indonesia

Email: journal.jcda@gmail.com

Phone: +62 341 366222

Website: https://aibpmpublisher.com/

Governed by

Association of International Business and Professional Management

Email: admin@aibpm.org

Website: https://www.aibpm.org/

Visitor Statistics

Flag Counter

Web Analytics

View JCDA Stats

Follow Us: