Concurrent Authority in Regional Government Relating to the Health Sector Based on Indonesian Regulations

Ciendy Meilanda Ivo Mongkaren

doi:10.32535/jcda.v7i1.2562

Concurrent Authority in Regional Government Relating to the Health Sector Based on Indonesian Regulations

Ciendy Meilanda Ivo Mongkaren

Abstract

This study supports analyzing health decentralization from three factors: authority, regional resources, and access. The research method used is by normative legal research examines law that is conceptualized as an applicable norm. The results of the study show how the implementation of concurrent affairs health decentralization in North Sulawesi and East Bolaang Mongondow regency is as follows: Low regional capacity characterized. Research indicates that concurrent authority in Indonesia’s decentralized health sector is governed by Law Number 23 of 2014. This law delineates responsibilities among the central government, provincial government, and city district governments in managing four specific health-related matters. The legal foundation aligns with constitutional recognition of health as a fundamental human right, as outlined in Law Number 39 of 1999 and the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (Law Number 11 of 2005). To optimize health services, stakeholders are urged to collaboratively implement concurrent authority efficiently. This synergy, grounded in legal frameworks and human rights principles, promises to advance the realization of an adequate standard of living and the highest attainable health standards for all Indonesians.

Keywords

Concurrent Authority; Health; Regional Government

Full Text:

PDF

References

Alajmi, R., Albaseri, S., Alawadhi, R., & Alhabashi, H. (2023). AstraZeneca–The success links back to organization. Journal of The Community Development in Asia, 6(1), 90-99.https://doi.org/10.32535/jcda.v6i1.1868

Anugrah, F., Bachri, S., & Sumardi, J. (2022). The authority of the civil service police unit in securing regional assets of the South Sulawesi provincial government. Al- Risalah Jurnal Ilmu Syariah dan Hukum, 121-141. https://doi.org/10.24252/al- risalah.vi.31474

Farda, N. F., & Putra, Y. H. (2019). Problematika Kewenangan Pemerintah Daerah di bidang Pertanahan. Pagaruyuang Law Journal, 3(1), 106-120. https://doi.org/10.31869/plj.v3i1.1670

Hadjon, P. M. (2015). Pengantar Hukum Administrasi Indonesia. Gadjah Mada University Press.

Indonesia. The Audit Board. (1999). Undang-undang (UU) Nomor 39 Tahun 1999 tentang Hak Asasi Manusia.https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Details/45361/uu-no-39- tahun-1999

Indonesia. The Audit Board. (2005). Undang-undang (UU) Nomor 11 Tahun 2005 tentang Pengesahan International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (Kovenan Internasional tentang Hak-Hak Ekonomi, Sosial dan Budaya). https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Details/40256/uu-no-11-tahun-2005

Indonesia. The Audit Board. (2007). Peraturan Pemerintah (PP) Nomor 38 Tahun 2007 tentang Pembagian Urusan Pemerintahan Antara Pemerintah Pemerintahan Daerah Provinsi Dan Pemerintahan Daerah Kabupaten Kota. https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Details/4760/pp-no-38-tahun-2007

Indonesia. The Audit Board. (2014). Undang-undang (UU) Nomor 23 Tahun 2014 tentang Pemerintahan Daerah.https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Details/38685/uu-no- 23-tahun-2014

Indonesia. The Audit Board. (2023). Undang-undang (UU) Nomor 17 Tahun 2023 tentang Kesehatan. https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Details/258028/uu-no-17-tahun- 2023

Lambelanova, R. (2017). Implementasi Kebijakan Otonomi Daerah Bidang Pendidikan, Kesehatan Dan Perekonomian Di Kabupaten Bandung Barat. Sosiohumaniora, 19(2), 185-198.https://doi.org/10.24198/sosiohumaniora.v19i2.12137

Matutu. M. D. (1999). Mandat, Delegasi, Attribusi dan Implementasinya di Indonesia. Yayasan Obor Indonesia.

Mulyanti, D. (2017). Konstitusionalitas Pengujian peraturan daerah melalui judicial review dan executive review. Jurnal Ilmiah Galuh Justisi, 5(1), 134-156. http://dx.doi.org/10.25157/jigj.v5i1.238

Ramadhani, M., Akbar, B., Jeddawi, M., & Tahir, M. I. (2021). Model pelimpahan kewenangan Badan Pemeriksa Keuangan dalam pelaksanaan tugas pemeriksaan pengelolaan dan tanggung keuangan negara. AKSELERASI: Jurnal Ilmiah Nasional, 3(1), 25-41.https://doi.org/10.54783/jin.v3i1.356

Ridwan, H. R. (2007). Hukum Administrasi Negara (1st ed.). Raja Grafindo Persada. Saiman, S. (2017). Politik Perbatasan. Malang: Intelegensia Media.

Sasana, H. (2019). Fiscal decentralization and regional economic growth. Economics Development Analysis Journal, 8(1), 108-119.https://doi.org/10.15294/edaj.v8i1.29879

Smith, B. C. (1985). Decentralization: The Territorial Dimension of the State (1st ed.). Routledge.

Syafrudin, A. (1976). Pengaturan Koordinasi Pemerintah di Daerah. Tarsito.

Sakit, S. R. (2004). Keputusan Menteri Kesehatan Republik Indonesia Nomor: 81/MENKES/SK/I/2004. Rumah Sakit Tugu Ibu. https://www.rstuguibu.com/files/KMK/81%20TAHUN%202004.pdf

Wuryandini, A. R., Pakaya, L., & Husain, S. P. (2023). Fraud Control to Strengthen Internal Control Systems in Local Goverment. International Journal of Applied Business and International Management, 8(2), 85-98.https://doi.org/10.32535/ijabim.v8i2.2471

Utomo, T. W. W. (2004). Pendelegasian kewenangan pemerintah daerah kepada kecamatan dan kelurahan dalam rangka memperkuat otonomi daerah. Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi: Media Pengembangan Ilmu dan Praktek Administrasi, 1(2), 17- 30.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.32535/jcda.v7i1.2562