Do Underlying Assets, Duration, Default Risk Level, Sukuk Liquidity, and Profitability Affect Sukuk Yield?

Dwi Irawati; Layla Nur Fadhila

doi:10.32535/ijafap.v7i1.2898

Do Underlying Assets, Duration, Default Risk Level, Sukuk Liquidity, and Profitability Affect Sukuk Yield?

Dwi Irawati, Layla Nur Fadhila

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to determine how underlying assets, duration, default risk level, Sukuk liquidity, and profitability affect Sukuk yields between 2016 and 2019. One of the primary motivations for such studies was the failure of asset-based Sukuk with low default risk but not with asset-backed Sukuk. Then, this study focuses on two types of Sukuk, namely asset-based Sukuk and asset-backed Sukuk, and how the yield of each type is determined by the underlying asset. Until then, duration, default risk level, Sukuk liquidity, and profitability are used as control variables in evaluating the impact of underlying assets on Sukuk yields. This study employed an analysis of the difference between the two independent sample groups as well as multiple regression. The analysis was performed on each type of Sukuk. The analysis revealed that the Sukuk yields of the two groups differed, with an asset-based Sukuk generating more than an asset-backed Sukuk. Meanwhile, in asset-based Sukuk, the risk of default raises the yield while duration, liquidity, and profitability remain unchanged. The default risk level and profitability do not affect the yield in the asset-backed Sukuk group, whereas the duration and liquidity of the Sukuk have a positive effect on the yield.

Keywords

Asset-based Sukuk; Asset-backed Sukuk; Underlying Assets; Yield

Full Text:

PDF

References

Accounting and Auditing Organization for Islamic Financial Institutions (AAOIFI). (2008a, September 15). Statement on Sukuk and Its Implication, https://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=2407133b-7b12-4e7f-8061-18b19be7de98

Accounting and Auditing Organization for Islamic Financial Institutions (AAOIFI). (n.d.a). Shariah Standard No. (17): Investment Sukuk. https://aaoifi.com/ss-17-investment-sukuk/?lang=en

Accounting and Auditing Organization for Islamic Financial Institutions (AAOIFI). (n.d.b). Resolution on Sukuk. https://islamicbankers.files.wordpress.com/2008/09/aaoifi_sb_sukuk_feb2008_eng.pdf

Bao, J., Pan, J., & Wang, J. (2011). The illiquidity of corporate bonds. The Journal of Finance, 66(3), 911-946. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2011.01655.x

Bareksa. (2020, February 17). Realisasi Penerbitan SBR009 Rp2,25 Triliun, Begini Rincian Profil Investornya. https://www.bareksa.com/berita/sbn/2020-01-17/realisasi-penerbitan-sbr009-rp225-triliun-begini-rincian-profil-investornya

Bodie, Z., Kane, A., & Marcus, A. J. (2014). Investments and Portfolio Management (9th ed.). Salemba Empat.

Chen, T. K., Liao, H. H., & Tsai, P. L. (2011). Internal liquidity risk in corporate bond yield spreads. Journal of Banking & Finance, 35(4), 978-987. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2010.09.013

Che-Yahya, N., Abdul-Rahim, R., & Mohd-Rashid, R. (2016). Determinants of corporate bond yield: the case of Malaysian bond market. International Journal of Business and Society, 17(2). https://doi.org/10.33736/ijbs.523.2016

Fabozzi, F. J., & Fabozzi, F. A. (2021). Bond Market, Analysis, and Strategies (10th ed.). The MIT Press.

Financial Services Authority (OJK). (2014). Peraturan OJK tentang Penawaran Umum Berkelanjutan Efek Bersifat Utang dan Sukuk. https://ojk.go.id/id/regulasi/otoritas-jasa-keuangan/peraturan-ojk/Pages/peraturan-ojk-tentang-penawaran-umum-berkelanjutan-efek-bersifat-utang-dan-sukuk.aspx

Financial Services Authority (OJK). (2015). POJK tentang Penerbitan dan Persyaratan Sukuk. https://ojk.go.id/id/regulasi/Pages/POJK-tentang-Penerbitan-dan-Persyaratan-Sukuk.aspx

Financial Services Authority (OJK). (2020). SUKUK. https://ojk.go.id/id/kanal/syariah/data-dan-statistik/data-produk-obligasi-syariah/Documents/Pages/-Statistik-Sukuk-Syariah---Oktober-2020/Statistik%20Sukuk%20Oktober%202020.pdf

Financial Services Authority (OJK). (n.d.). Roadmap Pasar Modal Syariah 2015-2019. https://www.ojk.go.id/id/kanal/syariah/berita-dan-kegiatan/publikasi/Documents/roadmap-pms_2015-2019.pdf

Friewald, N., Jankowitsch, R., & Subrahmanyam, M. G. (2012). Illiquidity or credit deterioration: A study of liquidity in the US corporate bond market during financial crises. Journal of Financial Economics, 105(1), 18-36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2012.02.001

Godlewski, C. J., Turk-Ariss, R., & Weill, L. (2016). Do the type of sukuk and choice of shari’a scholar matter?. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 132, 63-76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2016.04.020

Helwege, J., Huang, J. Z., & Wang, Y. (2014). Liquidity effects in corporate bond spreads. Journal of Banking & Finance, 45, 105-116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2013.08.018

Indonesia. Supreme Court. (2002). Fatwa DSN No 32/DSN-MUI/IX/2002 Tahun 2002. https://putusan3.mahkamahagung.go.id/peraturan/detail/11eaed05743348d089a7313731373036.html

Junaeni, I. (2020). Analysis of factors that influence decision making invest in capital markets in millennial generations. International Journal of Accounting & Finance in Asia Pasific, 3(3), 11-24. https://doi.org/10.32535/ijafap.v3i3.866

Khudari, M., & Saad, N. M. (2019). Sukuk issuance in the emerging markets-a relative evaluation. International Journal of Engineering and Advanced Technology, 9(1), 3571-3574. https://doi.org/10.35940/ijeat.A2689.109119

Lumapow, L. S., & Tumiwa, R. A. F. (2020). Working capital and debt policy on profitability of the companies. International Journal of Accounting & Finance in Asia Pasific, 3(2), 26-36. https://doi.org/10.32535/ijafap.v3i2.832

Naifar, N., & Mseddi, S. (2013). Sukuk spreads determinants and pricing model methodology. Afro-Asian Journal of Finance and Accounting, 3(3), 241-257. https://doi.org/10.1504/AAJFA.2013.054425

Nurfauziah, N., & Setyarini, A. F. (2004). Analisis faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi yield obligasi perusahaan (Studi kasus pada industri perbankan dan industri finansial). Jurnal Siasat Bisnis, 2(9), 241-256.

Paisarn, W. (2012). The determinants of Thailand bond yield spreads. Available at SSRN 2136979. https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2136979

Pribadi, Y. (2020). Preferensi Generasi Milenial untuk berinvestasi Sukuk. I-Finance: A Research Journal on Islamic Finance, 6(2), 80-89. https://doi.org/10.19109/ifinance.v6i2.6624

Putri, R. M., Siregar, H., & Andati, T. (2020). Effects of coupon, maturity, liquidity, and bond rating on the yields of banking bonds. Jurnal Ilmiah Bisnis Dan Ekonomi Asia, 14(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.32812/jibeka.v14i1.125

Sekaran, U., & Bougie, R. (2016). Research Methods for Business A Skill-Building Approach (7th ed.). Wiley & Sons.

Sharpe, W. F., Alexander, G. J., & Bailey, J. V. (2005). Investment (6th ed.). Indeks.

Tandelilin, E. (2017). Capital Market. Penerbit Kanisius.

Teoh, K. B., Pérez-Restrepo, C., López, C. A., Thulasedass, S., Chetana, S., Singh, P., ... & Das, A. (2021). A Study on Investors’ Perceptions towards Stock Market. International Journal of Accounting & Finance in Asia Pasific, 4(3), 60-74. https://doi.org/10.32535/ijafap.v4i3.1206

Usmani, M. T. (2007, February). Sukuk and their contemporary applications. In Translated from the original Arabic by Sheikh Yusuf Talal DeLorenzo, AAOIFI Shari’a Council meeting, Saudi Arabia. https://www.iefpedia.com/english/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/Sukuk-and-their-Contemporary-Applications.pdf

Utz, S., Weber, M., & Wimmer, M. (2016). German Mittelstand bonds: Yield spreads and liquidity. Journal of Business Economics, 86, 103-129. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11573-015-0791-3

Yuliani, U., Juanda, B., & Andati, T. (2016). Analysis of the influence of internal factor and external factor on yield bonds government in 2011-2014. International Journal of Science and Research, 5(8), 1090-1096.

Zolfaghari, P. (2017). An Introduction to Islamic Securities (Sukuk) [Working paper, Uppsala University]. https://www.jur.uu.se/digitalAssets/563/c_563862-l_3-k_wps2017-2.pdf

DOI: https://doi.org/10.32535/ijafap.v7i1.2898