Improving Tax Audit Quality through Accountability and Professional Experience: The Mediating Role of Information Technology

Ulfa Rabiyah, Dewi Anggraeni, Fitri Fitri, Muhammad Ziaul Haq Bakri

Abstract


The central issue addressed in this research is the inconsistent quality of tax audits and the growing demand for accountability and technological capability in modern audit practices. This study examines the influence of information technology use, accountability, and professional experience on tax audit quality in Indonesia, focusing on tax auditors at the Makassar Tax Service Office (KPP). A quantitative approach was employed using Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) based on survey responses from 125 tax auditors. The results show that accountability significantly enhances audit quality (b = 0.491, p < 0.001), while professional experience has no direct effect (b = -0.015, p = 0.890). Accountability and professional experience also significantly influence information technology use (b = 0.244, p = 0.003; b = 0.467, p < 0.001), and information technology improves audit quality (b = 0.355, p < 0.001). Furthermore, information technology mediates the influence of accountability and professional experience on tax audit quality. These findings highlight that high-quality tax audits rely on auditors’ integrity, responsibility, technical skills, and ability to leverage technology as a supporting resource. This research offers empirical insights into determinants of tax audit quality.


Keywords


Accountability, Audit Quality, Information Technology, Professional Experience

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ajzen, I. (2020). The theory of planned behavior: Frequently asked questions. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 2(4), 314–324. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbe2.195

Akuba, I. A., & Amiruddinn, A. (2025). Audit quality and technology factors in auditing in the digital age: Faktor kualitas audit dan teknologi dalam audit di era digital. Indonesian Journal of Innovation Studies, 26(3), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.21070/ijins.v26i3.1470

Alagi?, A., Turulja, L., & Bajgori?, N. (2021). Identification of information system audit quality factors. Journal of Forensic Accounting Profession, 1(2), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.2478/jfap-2021-0006

Ali, A. G., & Supriatna, U. (2025). The role of business strategy using information technology on branch offices in Indonesian Sharia banking. Asia Pacific Journal of Management and Education, 8(2), 272–288. http://doi.org/10.32535/apjme.v8i2.4056

Almagrashi, A., Mujalli, A., Khan, T., & Attia, O. (2023). Factors determining internal auditors’ behavioral intention to use computer-assisted auditing techniques: An extension of the UTAUT model and an empirical study. Future Business Journal, 9(1), 74. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43093-023-00231-2

Al-Omush, A., Almasarwah, A., & Al-Wreikat, A. (2025). Artificial intelligence in financial auditing: Redefining accuracy and transparency in assurance services. EDPACS: The EDP Audit, Control, and Security Newsletter, 70(6), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/07366981.2025.2459490

Anomah, S., Ayeboafo, B., & Aduamoah, M. (2021). An audit risk model for it audit ecosystems and digital transformation (DX) decision making. EDPACS: The EDP Audit, Control, and Security Newsletter, 64(2), 1–33. https://doi.org/10.1080/07366981.2021.1930643

Awad, R., & Ansar, M. (2024). Enhancing audit report quality through auditor professionalism: Regional inspectorate office of Central Sulawesi Province evidence. GoodWill Journal of Economics, Management, and Accounting, 4(2), 223–228. https://doi.org/10.26618/9dkqps75

Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108

Cohen, A., Kantor, J., & Levy, S. (2025). Does risk matter? An audit risk approach for technology adoption in financial audits. International Journal of Auditing, 30(1) 86–106. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijau.70005

Darmiono, D., & Pratiwi, R. (2024). Analysis of the relationship between e-commerce business and technology-based accounting information systems with company audit needs. West Science Information System and Technology, 2(1), 73–80. https://doi.org/10.58812/wsist.v2i01.815

Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008

Eulerich, M., Masli, A., Pickerd, J., & Wood, D. A. (2023). The impact of audit technology on audit task outcomes: Evidence for technology?based audit techniques. Contemporary Accounting Research, 40(2), 981–1012. https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3846.12847

Grant, A. M., & Shandell, M. S. (2022). Social motivation at work: The organizational psychology of effort for, against, and with others. Annual Review of Psychology, 73(1), 301–326. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-060321-033406

Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., Gudergan, S. P., Fischer, A., Nitzl, C., & Menictas, C. (2019). Partial least squares structural equation modeling-based discrete choice modeling: An illustration in modeling retailer choice. Business Research, 12(1), 115–142. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40685-018-0072-4

Hamdam, A., Jusoh, R., Yahya, Y., Jalil, A. A., & Abidin, N. H. Z. (2022). Auditor judgment and decision-making in big data environment: A proposed research framework. Accounting Research Journal, 35(1), 55–70. https://doi.org/10.1108/ARJ-04-2020-0078

Hategan, C. D., Pitorac, R. I., & Crucean, A. C. (2022). Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on auditors’ responsibility: evidence from European listed companies on key audit matters. Managerial Auditing Journal, 37(7), 886–907. https://doi.org/10.1108/MAJ-07-2021-3261

Heo, J. S., Kwon, S. Y., & Tan, H. T. (2021). Auditors' responses to workload imbalance and the impact on audit quality. Contemporary Accounting Research, 38(1), 338–375. https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3846.12612

Joshi, M. (2025). Motivation and Action: Key Concepts. Educohack Press.

Knechel, W. R., Krishnan, G. V., Pevzner, M., Shefchik, L. B., & Velury, U. K. (2013). Audit quality: Insights from the academic literature. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 38(2), 1–32. https://doi.org/10.2308/ajpt-50350

Leoni, G., Lai, A., Stacchezzini, R., Steccolini, I., Brammer, S., Linnenluecke, M., & Demirag, I. (2021). Accounting, management and accountability in times of crisis: Lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 34(6), 1305–1319. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-05-2021-5279

Luan, F., Zhang, Z., & Chen, Y. (2025). Audit quality and digitalisation in shaping firm innovation strategy: Evidence from China. Technology in Society, 81, 102807. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2024.102807

Napitupulu, B. E., Dewi, S., & Wijaya, A. (2023). The effect of work experience, profesionalism and remote audit on audit quality. International Journal of Informatics, Economics, Management and Science, 2(1), 15–30. https://doi.org/10.52362/ijiems.v2i1.999

Nugrahanto, A., & Alhadi, I. (2021). A tax audit quality: An empirical analysis of the use of information technology, competence, task complexity and time pressure. Info Artha, 5(2), 75–92. https://doi.org/10.31092/jia.v5i2.1380

Ocak, M., & Can, G. (2019). Do government-experienced auditors reduce audit quality?. Managerial Auditing Journal, 34(6), 722–748. https://doi.org/10.1108/MAJ-12-2017-1756

O'Donoghue, D., & Werff, L. V. D. (2022). Empowering leadership: Balancing self-determination and accountability for motivation. Personnel Review, 51(4), 1205–1220. https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-11-2019-0619

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2025). Revenue Statistics in Asian and Pacific Economies 2025. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/6c04402f-en

Putri, N. P. T. M. K., Suryandari, N. N. A., & Ernawatiningsih, N. P. L. (2025). Determination of taxpayer compliance with risk preferences as a moderation variable. International Journal of Accounting and Finance in Asia Pacific, 8(1), 72–93. https://doi.org/10.32535/ijafap.v8i1.3640

Putri, R. H. M., & Mardijuwono, A. W. (2020). The effect of competence, work experience, professionalism and auditor independence on audit quality. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, 13(9), 1–12.

Rabiyah, U., Hanafi, K., Kusumawati, A., & Indrijawati, A. (2024). Examiner performance influenced by core self-evaluation: Examining the moderating role of information technology. Interdisciplinary Journal of Management Studies, 17(4), 1125–1140. https://doi.org/10.22059/ijms.2024.361620.675992

Robi'ah, S., Yuhertiana, I., & Sholihatin, E. (2025). The impact of digitalization, auditor competence, and independence on external audit quality: A systematic literature review with a remote auditing perspective. Jurnal Riset Akuntansi Mercu Buana, 11(2), 213–223. https://doi.org/10.26486/jramb.v11i2.5004

Sekaran, U., & Bougie, R. (2016). Research Methods For Business: A Skill Building Approach (7th ed.). John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Setyana, H. D., Rono, S., & Nuraini, F. (2021). Pengalaman kerja auditor, etika auditor, dan kompetensi auditor terhadap kualitas audit pada kantor akuntan publik. Sustainable: Jurnal Akuntansi, 1(1), 185–204. https://doi.org/10.30651/stb.v1i1.9765

Shirowzhan, H., & Fakhari, H. (2024). Clarifying the decision-making mystery: Drivers of professional skepticism, ego depletion and overconfidence in independent auditors’ quality of judgment. Managerial Auditing Journal, 39(7), 821–842. https://doi.org/10.1108/MAJ-04-2024-4317

Syafa'at, M. S., Nurwahyuni, N., Ibrahim, F. N. A., & Kamidin, M. (2022). Pengaruh akuntabilitas auditor dan profesionalisme terhadap kualitas auditor pada kantor akuntan publik. Center of Economic Students Journal, 5(3), 258–270. https://doi.org/10.56750/csej.v5i3.543

Tannia, R., Rini, Y., & Yuliadi, E. (2021). Pengaruh independensi, akuntabilitas, due professional care, dan time budget pressure terhadap kualitas audit. eCo-Fin, 3(1), 203–212. https://doi.org/10.32877/ef.v3i1.401

Triwulani, N. K. A., Putra, I. M. W., & Sanjaya, I. K. P. W. (2023). Pengaruh akuntabilitas, profesionalisme dan pengalaman terhadap kualitas pada Kantor Akuntan Publik di Denpasar. Jurnal Riset Akuntansi Warmadewa, 4(1), 51–56. https://doi.org/10.22225/jraw.4.1.7622.51-56

Wang, J. (2023). Research on the construction of accounting information audit quality control system based on blockchain. Security and Privacy, 6(2), e227. https://doi.org/10.1002/spy2.227

Zhu, Y., & Manansala, L. (2024). The impact of digital transformation on the innovation capacity of Chinese-listed firms: The role of government subsidies. International Journal of Applied Business & International Management, 9(2), 182–197. https://doi.org/10.32535/ijabim.v9i2.3393




DOI: https://doi.org/10.32535/ijafap.v9i2.4435

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2026 Ulfa Rabiyah, Dewi Anggraeni, Fitri Fitri, Muh. Ziaul Haq Bakri

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

International Journal of Accounting and Finance in Asia Pacific (IJAFAP)

ISSN 2684-9763 (Print) | ISSN 2655-6502 (Online)

DOI Prefix: 10.32535 by CrossRef

Published by AIBPM Publisher

JL. Kawi No. 23, Bareng, Klojen, Kota Malang, Jawa Timur, Indonesia

Email: adm.ijafap@gmail.com

Phone: +62 896-8679-1980

Website: https://ejournal.aibpmjournals.com/index.php/IJAFAP

Governed by

Association of International Business and Professional Management

Email: admin@aibpm.org

Website: https://www.aibpm.org/

Indexed by

SINTA Garuda Google Scholar Dimensions Scilit ROAD Crossref Copernicus

Licensing Information

Creative Commons License
International Journal of Accounting and Finance in Asia Pacific (IJAFAP) is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Visitor Statistics

Flag Counter

Web Analytics

View IJAFAP Stats