The Effect of Transaction Costs on The Benefits of Hybrid Maize Farming in Dompu District, West Nusa Tenggara

Dodo Kurniawan, Candra Fajri Ananda, Putu Mahardika Adi S, Moh. Khusaini

Abstract


The characteristics of imperfect markets are characterized by the presence of transaction costs. One sector that is an imperfect market is the agricultural sector. The purpose of this study was to analyze the structure of transaction costs and the implications of transaction costs on the benefits of hybrid corn farming. The research method uses transaction cost analysis and multiple linear regression. The research was conducted in Dompu Regency, West Nusa Tenggara with 120 respondents as corn farmers. The results show that implementation costs are the component of transaction costs that have the highest percentage of 43.35%, then supervision costs are 28.37%, transportation costs are 20.61%, negotiation costs are 3.70%, information costs are 3.41% and coordination 0.57%. These transaction cost components are distributed in each hybrid corn farming cycle, among others; (1) birth cycle; (2) cropping cycle; (3) maintenance cycle; (4) supervision; (5) harvest cycle; and (6) postharvest cycle. The postharvest cycle is the cycle that has the highest percentage of 23.17%, then the maintenance cycle is 18.53%, the harvest cycle is 17.65%, the cropping cycle is 17.28% and the control cycle is 13.99%. Transaction costs have a positive and significant effect on the profits of hybrid corn farming.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abebe, G. K., & Bijman, J. (2013). Contract farming configuration: Smallholders ’ preferences for contract design attributes. Food Policy, 40, 14–24.

Angraini, E. (2005). Analisis biaya transaksi dan penerimaan nelayan dan petani di Palabuhan Ratu Kabupaten Sukabumi. Retrieved from https://repository.ipb.ac.id/handle/123456789/8047

Badan Litbang Pertanian. (2005). Prospek dan arah pengembangan agribisnis jagung. Jakarta Selatan.

Browning, M. (1992). Children and household economic behavior. Journal of Economic Literature, 30(3), 1434–1475.

Coase, R. H. (1992). The institutional structure of production. The American Economic Review, 82(4), 713–719.

Coase, Ronald Harry. (1934). The nature of the firm. Economic Journal, 4(440), 440–446.

Furubotn & Richter. (1999). Agricultural economics & economics. Agricultural Economics & Economics, (1996), 149–152.

Hernanto, F. (1996). Ilmu usahatani. Jakarta: Penebar Swadaya..

Kirchner, C., & Picot, A. (1987). Transaction cost analysis of structural changes in the distribution system: Reflections on institutional developments in the Federal Republic of Germany by, 143(1), 62–81.

Kuncoro, M. (2011). Metode kuantitatif ’ teori dan aplikasi untuk bisnis & ekonomi’ (IV). UPP-STIM YKPN.

Lee, S. (2008). Ownership structure and financial perfomance: Evidence from panel data of South Korea. Corporate Ownership & Control, 6(2).

Mburu, J. & R. B. (2002). Wildlife co-mangement in Kenya: An empirical analysis of landowners’ incentives for participation. Conference on International Agricultural Research for Development, (Gurung 1995), 1995–1999.

Mohamad, M. A. A., Darwanto, D. D, & Hartono, S. (2014). Analisis biaya transaksi jagung hibrida di Provinsi Gorontalo. Sepa, 11(1), 49–54.

Montalbano, P., Pietrelli, R. &, & Salvatici, L. (2018). Participation in the market chain and food security: The case of the Ugandan maize farmers. Food Policy, 76(March), 81–98.

Mubyarto. (1986). Pengantar Ekonomi pertanian. LP3ES. Jakarta.

North, D. C. (1990a). A transaction cost theory of politics. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 2(4), 355–367.

North, D. C. (1990b). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. institutions, institutional change and economic performance. North, Douglass C.

Rudi, H. Peru & Trias, Q. D. (2017). Panduan praktis budidaya jagung. Jakarta: Penebar Swadaya.

Stone, A. (1996). Public institutions and private transactions: A comparative analysis of the legal and regulatory environment for business transaction in Brazil and Chile. Cambridge: Camridge University Press.

Tefera, D. A. J. B., & M, A. S. (2016). Agricultural co-operatives in Ethiopia: Evolution, functions and impact. Journal of International Development, 96(1), 10–14.

Williamson, O. E. (1989). Chapter 3 transaction cost economics. Handbook of Industrial Organization, 1, 135–182.

Winarsono, B. (2012). Prospek dan kendala pengembangan agribisnis jagung di Propinsi Nusa Tenggara Barat. Jurnal Penelitian Pertanian, 12(2), 103–114.

Yeager, T. J. (1997). The new institutional economics and its relevance to social economics. Forum for Social Economics, 27(1), 1–17.

Yeager, T. J. (2004). Institutions, transition economies, and economic development. Journal of Comparative Economics, 32(2), 370–371.

Yustika & Rukavina. (2015). Konsep ekonomi kelembagaan perdesaan pertanian dan kedaulatan pangan. Malang: Empat Dua.

Yustika, A. E. (2012). Ekonomi kelembagaan “Paradigma, teori dan kebijakanâ€. Jakarta: Erlangga.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.32535/jicp.v4i1.1137

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2021 Dodo Kurniawan, Candra Fajri Ananda, Putu Mahardika Adi S, Moh. Khusaini

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Flag Counter

Published by:

AIBPM Publisher

Editorial Office:

JL. Kahuripan No. 9 Hotel Sahid Montana, Malang, Indonesia
Phone:
+62 341 366222
Email: journal.jicp@gmail.com
Website:http://ejournal.aibpmjournals.com/index.php/JICP

Supported by: Association of International Business & Professional Management

If you are interested to get the journal subscription you can contact us at admin@aibpm.org.

ISSN 2622-0989 (Print)
ISSN 2621-993X (Online)

DOI:Prefix 10.32535 by CrossREF

Journal of International Conference Proceedings (JICP) INDEXED:

 

In Process


This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.