KPI Assessment Using Business Process Analysis, Deterministic and Stochastic Monte Carlo Simulation. Case: KPI Fuel Ratio lt/bcm/km
Abstract
The study investigates the basic behavior of Key Performance Indicator (KPI) Fuel Ratio (lt/bcm/km) which has created confusion among analysts and decision makers in a mining company by its anomaly in measuring fuel efficiency. This investigation is a part of a KPI Life Cycle which known as KPI Assessment phase to review if the KPI still has the capability to provide a good measurement. The method of this research is using combination of both qualitative and quantitative approach. Started with Business Process Analysis (BPA) approach to modelling current KPI formulation into a flow chart diagram with cause-effect technique. Then the results from BPA phase are validated through simulation analysis in both deterministic and stochastic Monte Carlo methods. To support the validation phase, actual operational data is collected from database. The results discovered that anomaly of this KPI was occurred because current formulation incorporating parameters that irrelevant with haul distance variable. Once the irrelevant parameters were eliminated from the calculation in the simulation experimentation, the anomaly of the KPI was disappeared. The findings of this research suggest that the KPI measurement required a new formulation to create a more reliable and robust tool to monitor the fuel efficiency.
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Australian Government, Department of Industry, Innovation and Science (2016). Energy Management in Mining. Leading Practice Sustainable Development Program for the Mining Industry.
Australian Government, Dept of Resources, Energy and Tourism (2014). Analyses of diesel use for Mine Haul and transport operations
Bourne, M., Mills, J., Wilcox, M., Neely, A., & Platts, K. (2000). Designing, implementing, and updating performance measurement systems. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, Vol. 20 No. 7, 2000, pp. 754-771
Gackowiec, P., Podobi´nska-Staniec, M., Brzychczy, E., Kühlbach, C., & Özver, T. (2020). Review of Key Performance Indicators for Process Monitoring in the Mining Industry. MDPI: Energies 2020, 13(19), 5169; https://doi.org/10.3390/en13195169
Greasley, A. (2003). Using business-process simulation within a business process reengineering approach. Bus. Process Manage. J., vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 408–420
Hester, P., Ezell. B., Collins, A., Horst, J., & Lawsure, K. (2017). A Method for Key Performance Indicator Assessment in Manufacturing Organizations. International Journal of Operations Research Vol. 14, No. 4, 157−167
Katuuk, J. L. M., Tewal, B., Massie, J., & Lengkong, V. (2019). Strategic Measurement Method Using Balanced Scorecard Approach at The North Minahasa District Health Office. International Journal of Applied Business & International Management, Vol. 4 No. 2 (2019)
Koubarakis, M., & Plexousakis, D. (2002). A formal framework for business process modelling and design. Inf. Syst., vol. 27, pp. 299–319
Novitasari, E., Maharani, S. M., & Wardoy, C. (2020). Reconstruction Of Performance Measurement Models For Mental Hospitals. Asia Pacific Journal of Management and Education (APJME), Vol 3, No 3 (2020)
Prasetyaningtyas, S. W., Maarif, S., Sobir, R. & Hermawan, A. (2019). The Use of Soft System Methodology in Evaluating the Business Strategies in Organic Farming: The Case from Yogyakarta, Indonesia. Asia Pacific Journal of Management and Education (APJME), Vol 2, No 2 (2019)
Renard, P., Alcolea, A., & Ginsbourger, D. (2013). Stochastic versus Deterministic Approaches. John Wainwright, Mark Mulligan (Eds), Environmental Modelling: Finding Simplicity in Complexity, Second Edition, pp. 133-149
Rodovalho, E., Mota Lima, H., & Tomi, G. (2016). New approach for reduction of diesel consumption by comparing different mining haulage configurations. Journal of Environmental Management, vol 172, pp. 177-185
Siami-Irdermoosa, E., & Dindarloo, S.R. (2015). Prediction of Fuel Consumption of Mining Dump Truck: A Neural Network Approach. Elsevier: Applied Energy 151, 77-84
Suleman, A. (1994). A controversial-issues approach to enhance management accounting education. Journal of Accounting Education: 59–75
Van der Aalst, W. M. P (2007). Challenges in Business Process Analysis. Conference Paper in Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-88710-2_3 · Source: DBLP
Van der Aalst, W. M. P., & van Hee, K.M. (1996). Business process redesign A Petri-net-based approach. Comput. Ind., vol. 29, pp. 15–26
Vergidis, K., Tiwari, A., & Majeed, B. (2008). Business Process Analysis and Optimization: Beyond Reengineering. IEEE Transactions on Systems Man and Cybernetics Part C (Applications and Reviews) 38(1):69-82, DOI:10.1109/TSMCC.2007.905812
Wetzstein, B. (2016). KPI-Related Monitoring, Analysis, and Adaptation of Business Processes. Stuttgart University.
Wetzstein, B., Leitner, P., Rosenberg, F., Brandic, I., Dustdar, S., & Leymann, F. (2009). Monitoring and Analyzing Influential Factors of Business Process Performance. DOI: 10.1109/EDOC.2009.18 · Source: OAI
Wetzstein, B., Strauch, S., & Leymann, F. (2009). Measuring Performance Metrics of WS-BPEL Service Compositions. The Fifth International Conference on Networking and Services (ICNS 2009), Valencia, Spain, April 20-25, 2009. IEEE Computer Society, April 2009
Zakarian, A. (2001). Analysis of process models: A fuzzy logic approach. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., vol. 17, pp. 444–452
DOI: https://doi.org/10.32535/jicp.v4i3.1305
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2021 Gilang Artha Putra, Nur Budi Mulyono

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Published by:
AIBPM Publisher
Editorial Office:
JL. Kahuripan No. 9 Hotel Sahid Montana, Malang, Indonesia
Phone:+62 341 366222
Email: journal.jicp@gmail.com
Website:http://ejournal.aibpmjournals.com/index.php/JICP
Supported by: Association of International Business & Professional Management
If you are interested to get the journal subscription you can contact us at admin@aibpm.org.
ISSN 2622-0989 (Print)
ISSN 2621-993X (Online)
DOI:Prefix 10.32535 by CrossREF
Journal of International Conference Proceedings (JICP) INDEXED:
In Process
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.