Fraud Heptagon Analysis from the Perspective of the Beneish M-Score

Sri Luna Murdianingrum, Eva Dwi Astuti, Erissa Dwi Yunita Sary, Ninggih Annisa Daniswara

Abstract


This study examines the influence of Fraud Heptagon elements financial stability, nature of industry, change in auditor, change in director, CEO duality, insufficient corporate governance courses, and remuneration on financial statement fraud in construction companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange during 2021–2025. Fraud was measured using the Beneish M-Score model. This quantitative study uses secondary data from annual reports, analyzed through logistic regression with SPSS 26. Results show that financial stability has a significant positive effect on financial statement fraud. The other variables nature of industry, change in auditor, change in director, CEO duality, insufficient corporate governance courses, and remuneration show no significant effect. This indicates that in the construction sector, financial pressure is the primary driver of fraud, whereas opportunity, rationalization, capability, arrogance, collusion, and greed can be mitigated by industry characteristics, regulatory compliance, and governance mechanisms.

Full Text:

PDF

References


ACFE. (2024). Occupational fraud 2024: A report to the nations. Association of Certified Fraud Examiners.

Alyani, M., Satria, I., & Wahyoeni, S. I. (2023). The effect of fraud hexagon on financial statement fraud in property and real estate sector companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) in 2017–2021. INQUISITIVE, 3(2). http://journal.univpancasila.ac.id/index.php/INQUISITIVE/

Angelia Pungus, C., Noviyanti, S., & Dian Purnamasari, G. (2025). Menguji potensi kecurangan laporan keuangan berdasarkan fraud hexagon. [Nama jurnal perlu dilengkapi], 5(2), 255–272.

Astuti, D. E., & Murdianingrum, L. (2026). Pengaruh fraud heptagon theory terhadap deteksi financial statement fraud pada perusahaan sub-sektor konstruksi bangunan yang terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia periode 2021–2024.

Badan Pusat Statistik. (2022). Statistik kriminal 2022.

Badan Pusat Statistik. (2023). Statistik kriminal 2023 (Vol. 14).

Badan Pusat Statistik. (2024). Statistik kriminal 2024 (Vol. 15).

Badan Pusat Statistik. (2025). Statistik kriminal 2024–2025 (Vol. 16).

Beneish, M. D. (1999). The detection of earnings manipulation. Financial Analysts Journal, 55(5), 24–36. https://doi.org/10.2469/faj.v55.n5.2296

Bifadli, I., Hardi, H., & Putra, F. (2023). Deteksi financial statement fraud dengan analisis fraud hexagon. Jurnal Akuntansi Bisnis, 16(2), 112. https://doi.org/10.30813/jab.v16i2.3585

Carla, C., & Pangestu, S. (2021). Deteksi fraudulent financial reporting menggunakan fraud pentagon. Ultimaccounting: Jurnal Ilmu Akuntansi, 13(1), 125–142. https://doi.org/10.31937/akuntansi.v13i1.1857

Chandrawati, N. B., & Ratnawati, D. (2021). Studi financial statement fraud dengan fraud triangle theory. E-Bisnis: Jurnal Ilmiah Ekonomi dan Bisnis, 14(1), 147–159. https://doi.org/10.51903/e-bisnis.v14i1.383

Cressey’s. (1953). Detecting and predicting financial statement fraud: The effectiveness of the fraud triangle and SAS No. 99. http://ssrn.com/abstract=1295494

Crowe, H. (2011). The mind behind the fraudsters’ crime: Key behavioral and environmental elements. Crowe Horwath LLP.

Damarjati, R. G., & Yulianti, R. (2025). Pengaruh penerapan heptagon fraud theory terhadap kecurangan laporan keuangan. LITERA: Jurnal Literasi Akuntansi, 5(2), 55–73. https://doi.org/10.55587/jla.v5i2.156

Dewa, I., Dhamayanti, A. C., & Rasmini, N. K. (2025). Komponen fraud hexagon theory pada indikasi kecurangan laporan keuangan perusahaan. E-Jurnal Ekonomi dan Bisnis Universitas Udayana, 14(12), 1756–1775. https://ojs.unud.ac.id/index.php/EEB/

Djami, R. A., & Murtanto. (2024). Factors that influence fraud heptagon theory on financial statements fraud: Empirical study on the mining sector listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange. Journal Research of Social Science, Economics and Management, 4, 85–103. https://doi.org/10.59141/jrssem.v3i08.559

Gee, J., Button, M., Hock, B., & Shepherd, D. (2021). Fraud and corruption in the construction sector.

Ghozali, I. (2021). Aplikasi analisis multivariate dengan program SPSS 26 (10th ed.). Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.

Handayani, J. R., Nurcahyono, N., Saadah, N., & Winarsih. (2023). Hexagon fraud: Detection of fraudulent financial statement in Indonesia. Atlantis Press International. https://doi.org/10.2991/978-94-6463-154-8_24

Hardika, I., Balqis, N., & Machdar, N. M. (2024). Pengaruh financial stability, nature of industry, dan change in auditor terhadap financial statements fraud. Inisiatif: Jurnal Ekonomi, Akuntansi dan Manajemen, 3(3), 72–89. https://doi.org/10.30640/inisiatif.v3i3.2565

Hermawati, A., & Nugroho, D. S. (2025). Pengaruh financial stability, financial target, nature of industry, dan auditor switch terhadap financial statement fraud. Kebijakan Ekonomi Digital, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.61132/apke.v2i1.840

Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X

Kanten, P., & Ulker, F. (2015). The Macrotheme Review. A Multidisciplinary Journal of Global Macro Trends, 2(4), 144–160.

Khoyumi, K., Puspa Inggani, A., & Hadiyati, S. N. (2024). Detecting financial statement fraud using the hexagon fraud theory approach in financial sector companies. Journal Research of Social Science, Economics, and Management, 4(2), 226–242. https://doi.org/10.59141/jrssem.v4i2.695

Kieso, D. E., Weygandt, J. J., & Warfield, T. D. (2020). Intermediate accounting: IFRS edition (4th ed.). Wiley.

Kirana, M., Toni, N., Afiezan, A., & Simorangkir, E. N. (2023). Apakah teori kecurangan hexagon efektif mencegah manipulasi laporan keuangan perusahaan BUMN? Jurnal Akuntansi Multiparadigma, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.jamal.2023.14.1.06

Kusumastuti, & Sari. (2023). Pendekatan hexagon fraud theory dalam mendeteksi financial statement fraud. [Nama jurnal perlu dilengkapi], 10(4). https://doi.org/10.32534/jpk.v10i4.4969

Lubis, A. F., & Purba, R. (2024). Pengaruh fraud pentagon terhadap fraudulent financial statement pada perusahaan sub-sektor konstruksi dan bangunan yang terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia (BEI).

Marheni, D. K., & Suryati, S. (2021). Analysis of financial stability factors, financial targets, external pressure, inefficient monitoring and rationalization of the financial statements fraud. Almana: Jurnal Manajemen dan Bisnis, 5(2), 241–248. https://doi.org/10.36555/almana.v5i2.1626

Mariati, & Indrayani, E. (2020). Fraud triangle analyses in detecting fraudulent financial statement using fraud score model. Jurnal Ilmiah Ekonomi Bisnis, 25(1), 29–44. https://doi.org/10.35760/eb.2020.v25i1.2240

Medlar, I., & Umar, H. (2023). Fraud diamond analysis of financial statement fraud. Enrichment: Journal of Management, 13(3), 2133–2143.

Milania, S. D., & Triyono, T. (2022). Pengaruh fraud pentagon terhadap kecurangan laporan keuangan dengan menggunakan Beneish M-Score model. Jurnal Impresi Indonesia, 1(3), 261–274. https://doi.org/10.36418/jii.v1i3.31

Omukaga, K. O. (2021). Is the fraud diamond perspective valid in Kenya? Journal of Financial Crime, 28(3), 810–840. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFC-11-2019-0141

Pamungkas, I. D., Oktavianasari, I., Fathimah, & Jasmine, A. N. (2024). The role of audit committee and institutional ownership as moderating: Analysis fraud heptagon in Indonesia. WSEAS Transactions on Business and Economics, 21, 2665–2677. https://doi.org/10.37394/23207.2024.21.218

Permatasari, D., & Suhendro, S. (2025). Heptagon fraud: Detecting financial statement fraud in Indonesia’s consumer goods manufacturing industry. International Journal of Economics and Management Research, 4(1), 275–287. https://doi.org/10.55606/ijemr.v4i1.313

Puspitasari, H. P., & Harto, P. (2024). Pengaruh determinan fraud hexagon theory dalam mendeteksi fraudulent financial statement. Akurasi: Jurnal Studi Akuntansi dan Keuangan, 7(2), 361–382. https://doi.org/10.29303/akurasi.v7i2.577

Rahayu, & Susilowati. (2025). Persepsi teori fraud hexagon terhadap fraudulent financial statement. Jambura Economic Education Journal, 7. https://ejurnal.ung.ac.id/index.php/jej/index

Salamah, & Marliani. (2025). Pengaruh external pressure, nature of industry dan rationalization terhadap financial statement fraud. [Nama jurnal perlu dilengkapi]. https://journal.cattleyadf.org/index.php/Jasmien/index

Sary, Y. D. E., & Murdianingrum, L. (2026). Fraud hexagon sebagai determinan fraudulent financial statement dengan proksi Beneish M-Score pada perusahaan properti dan real estate. https://doi.org/10.33395/owner.v10i3.3440

Satata, D. P. I., Pamungkas, I. D., Sumaryati, A., & Minarso, B. (2024). The role of institutional ownership in detecting fraudulent financial reporting: Fraud heptagon model analysis. Maksimum, 14(1), 37–47. https://doi.org/10.26714/mki.14.1.2024.37-47

Septiningrum, K. E., & Mutmainah, S. (2022). Analisis faktor yang mempengaruhi terjadinya financial statement fraud: Perspektif fraud hexagon theory. Diponegoro Journal of Accounting, 11(3), 1–13. http://ejournal-s1.undip.ac.id/index.php/accounting

Siswanto Yanuar Dananjaya, Y. P., & Soeindra, M. V. (2022). Fraudulent analysis of financial statements on real estate & property companies 2015–2019: Hexagon theory approach. International Journal of Research and Analytical Reviews. https://www.ijrar.org/

Skousen, C. J., Smith, K. R., & Wright, C. J. (2009). Detecting and predicting financial statement fraud: The effectiveness of the fraud triangle and SAS No. 99. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1569-3732(2009)0000013005

Subramanyam, K. R. (2017). Analisis laporan keuangan (Edisi 11, Buku 1). Salemba Empat.

Sujeewa, G. M. M., & Kawshalya, M. D. P. (2020). Detecting red flags of corporate financial statement frauds using Beneish M-Score model in Sri Lanka. International Journal of Accounting and Business Finance, 6(2), 71. https://doi.org/10.4038/ijabf.v6i2.72

Tarjo, T., Anggono, A., & Sakti, E. (2021). Detecting indications of financial statement fraud: A hexagon fraud theory approach. AKRUAL: Jurnal Akuntansi, 13(1), 119–131. https://doi.org/10.26740/jaj.v13n1.p119-131

Triyanto, D. N., Fajri, M. A. N., & Wahyuni, D. (2023). How is financial reporting fraud with the fraud hexagon approach before and during COVID-19 pandemic? Journal of Contemporary Accounting, 5(2), 97–114. https://doi.org/10.20885/jca.vol5.iss2.art4

Vousinas, G. L. (2019). Advancing theory of fraud: The S.C.O.R.E. model. Journal of Financial Crime, 26(1), 372–381. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFC-12-2017-0128

Wardhana, G. A., Indriati, L., Rahayu, M., & Firdaus. (2025). Analisis fraud hexagon terhadap fraudulent financial statement (Studi empiris pada perusahaan property dan real estate yang terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia (BEI) tahun 2019–2022). https://doi.org/10.37817/IKRAITH-EKONOMIKA

Wilantari, N. M., & Ariyanto, D. (2023). Determinan fraud hexagon theory dan indikasi financial statement fraud. E-Jurnal Akuntansi, 33(1), 87. https://doi.org/10.24843/EJA.2023.v33.i01.p07

Wolfe, D. T., & Hermanson, D. R. (2004). The fraud diamond: Considering the four elements of fraud. The CPA Journal, 74(12), 38–42.

Yadiati, W., Rezwiandhari, A., & Ramdany. (2023). Detecting fraudulent financial reporting in state-owned company: Hexagon theory approach. JAK (Jurnal Akuntansi) Kajian Ilmiah Akuntansi, 10(1), 128–147. https://doi.org/10.30656/jak.v10i1.567

Yusof, K. M. (2015). Fraudulent financial reporting: An application of fraud models to Malaysian public listed companies [Thesis, University of Hull].




DOI: https://doi.org/10.32535/jicp.v9i4.5178

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2026 Sri Luna Murdianingrum, Eva Dwi Astuti, Erissa Dwi Yunita Sary, Ninggih Annisa Daniswara

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Flag Counter

Published by:

AIBPM Publisher

Editorial Office:

JL. Kahuripan No. 9 Hotel Sahid Montana, Malang, Indonesia
Phone:
+62 341 366222
Email: journal.jicp@gmail.com
Website:http://ejournal.aibpmjournals.com/index.php/JICP

Supported by: Association of International Business & Professional Management

If you are interested to get the journal subscription you can contact us at admin@aibpm.org.

ISSN 2622-0989 (Print)
ISSN 2621-993X (Online)

DOI:Prefix 10.32535 by CrossREF

Journal of International Conference Proceedings (JICP) INDEXED:

 

In Process


This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.