The Ideal Concept of Dispute Resolution of Regional Head Election Results in the Constitutional Court

Alfian Ratu

doi:10.32535/jcda.v7i1.2660

The Ideal Concept of Dispute Resolution of Regional Head Election Results in the Constitutional Court

Alfian Ratu

Abstract

Direct Regional Head Elections can be understood more closely to the meaning of democracy. Pilkada underwent a change in term to Pemilukada, when Pilkada was categorized as part of the election, because it was followed by the transfer of authority to adjudicate disputes over election results from the Supreme Court (MA) to the Constitutional Court (MK).The purpose of this study is to find the ideal concept of dispute resolution of regional head election results. Elections are general elections to elect regional heads and deputy regional heads. In its development, the problem of the implementation of elections often occurs disputes, especially the results of the implementation of the election itself. In the Regional Head General Election Dispute is very complicated, many factors influence it both in terms of legal material violations and formal violations. Based on the results of the research found, there is a Comparison of the Periodization of Judicial Disputes of Pemilukada. With the above problems, it shows that problems in law enforcement are related to solving problems that are fair and have legal certainty in resolving election disputes. The conclusion in this study is the ideal concept of dispute resolution of future election results related to the scope of authority, legal position of the parties, object of dispute, grace period, content of application, case examination, evidence and decision.

Keywords

Constitutional Court; Dispute Resolution; General Election; Regional Head

Full Text:

PDF

References

Abdulkadir, M. (2004). Hukum dan Penelitan Hukum. PT. Citra Aditya Bakti

Abel, R. L. (1973). A comparative theory of dispute institutions in society. Law & Society Review, 8, 217.

Antari, P. E. D. (2018). Interpretasi demokrasi dalam sistem mekanis terbuka pemilihan umum di Indonesia. Jurnal Panorama Hukum, 3(1), 87-104.https://doi.org/10.21067/jph.v3i1.2359

Azmulian, R. (2003). Politik Uang dalam Pemilihan Kepala Daerah. Ghalia Indonesia. Friedman, L. M. (2009). Sistem Hukum Perspektif Ilmu Sosial. Nusa Media

Gainau, H., Maramis, R. A., Kalalo, M. E., & Waha, C. J. (2023). The existence of the rights of indigenous people in the implementation of regional autonomy. International Journal of Applied Business and International Management, 8(2), 67-84.https://doi.org/10.32535/ijabim.v8i2.2426

Haris, S. (2014). Partai, Pemilu, dan Parlemen Era Reformasi. Yayasan Pustaka Obor Indonesia.

Harvelian, A., Safa’at, M. A., Widiarto, A. E., & Qurbani, I. D. (2023). Interpretation of the constitution on the arrangement of state-owned enterprises in the national economic system based on the decision of the constitutional court. Nurani: Jurnal Kajian Syari'ah dan Masyarakat, 23(1), 171-188.https://doi.org/10.19109/nurani.v23i1.17109

Haryadi, A. D. (2012). Demokrasi Lokal: Evaluasi Pemilukada di Indonesia. Konstitusi Press.

Jian, O. Z., Utama, A. G. S., Musa, W. N. A. B. W., Hasly, W. B., Al-Rifae, R. F. B., Hussa, N. S. A. B. M., & Andriawan, N. (2021). Effective marketing strategies of McDonald’s in Malaysia and Indonesia. International Journal of Applied Business and International Management, 6(2), 33-46.

https://doi.org/10.32535/ijabim.v6i2.1167

Junaidi, V. (2013). Mahkamah Konstitusi Bukan Mahkamah Kalkulator. Perludem. Manan, B. (2007). Kekuasaan Kehakiman Indonesia dalam UU No. 4 of 2004. FH UII Press

Pruitt, D. G., & Rubin, J. Z. (1986). Social Conflict: Escalation, Stalemate, and Settlement. Random Hourse Inc.

Salim, H. S., & Nurbani, E. S. (2013). Penerapan Teori Hukum pada Penelitian Disertasi dan Tesis. RajaGrafindo Persada

Santoso, T. (2006). Penegakan Hukum Pemilu Praktik Pemilu 2004, Kajian Pemilu 2009- 2014. Perludem.

Sasongko, B., Harnani, S., & Bawono, S. (2022). Value-added Agriculture, Investment, and Infrastructure Development in the Indonesian Economy: VECM Approach. Asia Pacific Journal of Management and Education, 5(2), 26-37.https://doi.org/10.32535/apjme.v5i2.1548

Thaib, D. (2003). Menuju Parlemen Bikameral (Studi Konstitusional Perubahan Ketiga UUD 1945). Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum, 10(23), 85-97.https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol10.iss23.art5

Wijaya, R. (2023). Fungsi Mahkamah Konstitusi Dalam Pengujian Undang-Undang Terhadap Undang-Undang Dasar 1945. IJOLARES: Indonesian Journal of Law Research, 1(1), 23-27.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.32535/jcda.v7i1.2660