Determination Of Activity Relationship Chart (ARC) Method in Evaluation Of Office Layout (Case Study on Hotels & Apartments XYZ Bandung)

Ayi Tejaningrum; Gita Muthia Hasna

doi:10.32535/ijabim.v9i2.3417

Determination Of Activity Relationship Chart (ARC) Method in Evaluation Of Office Layout (Case Study on Hotels & Apartments XYZ Bandung)

Ayi Tejaningrum, Gita Muthia Hasna

Abstract

Layout design is a physical arrangement that regulates the flow of materials, information, and human relationships.XYZ Bandung Apartment has 12 departments located on the lobby floor to the fourth basement floor. The company has an office layout that is still not optimally organized, such as the placement of departments that are far apart, ineffective handling of goods and the risk of work accidents. The purpose of this study is to improve the existing layout so that the results of the comparison between before and after the repair will be seen. The research method is a survey where employee and management preferences are the reference in determining close relationships. The research method is a survey, with the analysis tool used is ACV (Activity Relations Chart) where employee and manager preferences are the reference in determining close relationships. The selected sample was 56 people consisting of management and employees. Based on the results of the analysis, there were changes in department placement resulting in an efficiency of travel distance between sections of 64.3% and time efficiency of 64.4%. Several proposed changes related to the relocation of less important departments and relatively low frequency of relationships

Full Text:

PDF

References

A, J., Tompkins, A, J., White, & al., e. (2016). Facilities Planning. For Editions. New York: Wiley & Sons Inc.

Ali Naqvi, S. A., Fahad, M., Atir, M., Zubair, M., & Shehzad, M. M. (2016). Productivity improvement of a manufacturing facility using systematic layout planning.

Cogent Engineering, 3(1), 1207296.

Allen, T., & Henn, G. (2007). The organization and architecture of innovation. Elsevier. Apple, & James, M. (2016). Tata Letak Pabrik dan Pemindahan Bahan (Terjemahan

Mardiono, Nurhayati M.T.). Bandung: ITB.

Azadivar, F., & Wang, J. (2000). Facility layout optimization using simulation and genetic algorithms. International Journal of Production Research, 38(17), 4369- 4383.

Barry, P., & Harnes. (2008). The Impact of Office Layout On Productivity. Journal of Facilities Management, 189-201.

De Croon, E., Sluiter, J., Kuijer, P. P., & Frings-Dresen, M. (2005). The effect of office concepts on worker health and performance: a systematic review of the literature. Ergonomics, 48(2), 119-134.

Dorrah, D. H., & Marzouk, M. (2021). Integrated multi-objective optimization and agent- based building occupancy modeling for space layout planning. Journal of Building Engineering, 34, 101902.

Durmusoglu, Z. D. (2018). A TOPSIS-based approach for sustainable layout design: activity relation chart evaluation. Kybernetes, 47(10), 2012-2024.

Dweiri, F. (1999). Fuzzy development of crisp activity relationship charts for facilities layout. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 36(1), 1-16.

ErgÃ¼n, E., Gunesti, L., & Khatib, W. (2020). The Evaluation of Appropriate Office Layout Design with MCDM Techniques. Retrieved from SN Applied Science: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s42452-020-2181-x

GÃ¶lcÃ¼k, Ä°., Durmaz, E. D., & Åžahin, R. (2022). Interval type-2 fuzzy development of FUCOM and activity relationship charts along with MARCOS for facilities layout evaluation. Applied Soft Computing, 128, 109414.

Hadiatna, D. R. (2018). Urgensi Penataan Layout Kantor dalam Upaya Meningkatkan Efektivitas Kerja Karyawan. Jurnal Manajemen Kantor:Politeknik Negeri Bandung, 1-13.

Haming, M., & Nurnajamudin, M. (2014). Manajemen Produksi Modern : Operasi Manufaktur dan Jasa. Edisi 3. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Hapsari, D. R., Santosan, D., & Dyah, C. S. (2017). Analisis Tata Ruang Kantor (Sudi Kasus Di Kantor Dinas Pendidikan Pemuda dan Olahraga Kabupaten Boyolali). Jurnal Informasi dan Komunikasi Administrasi Perkantoran, Vol. 1, No. 1, hlm 85-99.

Hayne, & barry. (2008). The impact of office layout on productivity. Journal of Facilities Management, 6 (3), 189-201.

Heizer, J., & Render, B. (2015). Manajemen Operasi: Keberlangsungan dan Rantai Pasokan. Edisi Sebelas. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.

Jacobs, F. R., & Chase, R. B. (2015). Manajemen Operasi dan Rantai Pasokan, ed.14.

Jakarta: Salemba Empat.

Jamaludin, A., & Fauzi, H. R. (2020). Metode Activity Relationship Chart (Arc) Untuk Analisis Perancangan Tata Letak Fasilitas Pada Bengkel Nusantara Depok. Bulletin of Applied Industrial Engineering Theory, Vol.1 No.2.Pp.20-22.

Javanroodi, K., Nik, V. M., & Mahdavinejad, M. (2019). A novel design-based optimization framework for enhancing the energy efficiency of high-rise office buildings in urban areas. Sustainable Cities and Society, 49, 101597.

Kovacs, G., & Kot, S. (2017). Facility layout redesign for efficiency improvement and cost reduction. Journal of Applied Mathematics and Computational Mechanics, Vol 16, Nr 1., Page 63-74.

Mariam, I., & Narasis, O. (2014). Implementasi Tata Ruang Kantor dalam Mewujudkan Produktivitas Kerja Pegawai pada PT Telekomunikasi Seluar (Telkomsel).

Epigram, Vol. 1, No. 1, hlm. 47-54.

Muzaffar, A., Noor, P., Anwar, & Noorlina. (2020). A Comparative Study on The Impacts of Open Plan and Closed Office Layout Towards. Journal Penyelidikan Sain Sosial, Vol. 3. Issue 6., Pp 49-56.

Ojaghi, Y., Khademi, A., Yusof, N., Renani, N., & Syed, S. (n.d.). Production Layout Optimamization for small and medium scale food industry. Procedia CIRP, (pp. 247-251).

Pitchforth, J., Nelson, E., van der Helder, M., & Oosting, W. (2020, 6 15). The Work Environment Pilot : An Experiment to determine the optimal office design for a technology company.

Pradana, E., & Nurchayo, C. B. (2014). Analisis Tata Letak Fasilitas Proyek Menggunakan Activity Relationship Chart dan Multi-Objectives Function pada Proyek Pembangunan Apartemen De Papilio Surabaya. Jurnal Teknik POMITS, Vol. 3, No. 2, hlm. 131-136.

Prayogo, A., & Zusi, H. (2020). Increase Efficiency With Production Model Re-Leyout Using Activity Relationship Chart. Dinasti International Journal of Education Management And Social Science, 1(3), 270-281.

Reddy, & Chitra. (2013). Advantages and Disadvantages of Closed Office Layout.

International Journal of Engineering and Advanced Technology (IJEAT), 500- 504.

Safitri, N. D., Ilmi, Z., & Kadafi, M. A. (2017). Analisis Perancangan Tata Letak Fasilitas Produksi Menggunakan Metode Activity Relationship Chart (ARC). Jurnal Manajemen, Vol. 9, No. 1, hlm. 1-16.

Sander, L. (2018, 7 18). A New Study Should Be The Final Nail For Open Plan Offices.

Retrieved from https://theconversation.com/a-new-study-should-be-the- final- nail-for-open-plan-offices-99756

Shah, C. R., & Joshi, A. M. (2013). Increased Productivity in Factory Layout by Using Systematic Layout Planning (SLP). International Journal of Advanced Engineering Technology, 61-63.

Sonta, A., Dougherty, T. R., & Jain, R. K. (2021). Data-driven optimization of building layouts for energy efficiency. Energy and Buildings, 238, 110815.

Vinod arya, e. (2013). Increased Productivity and Planning By Improved Plant Layout Using Systematic Layout Planning at NCRM Division, Bhushan Steels Ltd.

Khopoli, Mumbai. International journal of innovations in engineering & Technology, 297-304.

Winarno, H. (2015). Analisis Tata Letak Fasilitas Ruang Fakultas Teknik Universitas Serang Raya dengan Menggunakan Metode Activity Relationship Chart (ARC). Jurnal Fakultas Teknik Universitas Muhammadiyah Jakarta, 1-10.

Wulansari, A., & Yohanes, A. (2010). Perencanaan Ulang Tata Letak Fasilitas Produksi untuk Penanganan Masalah Material Handling dan Tata Ruang Di PT. Jamu Indonesia Simona. Dinamika Teknik, Vol. 4, No. 2, hlm. 13-23.

Zerella, S., Trueur, V, Albrecht, K., & S.L. (2017). The Influence Of Office Layout Features On Employee Perception Of Organizational Culture. Journal of Environmental Psychology.

Zoltan, E. S. (2014). Office Space for More Innovation and Space Efficiency.

International Journal for Engineering and Information Sciences, Vol 9, No2., pp 67-76.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.32535/ijabim.v9i2.3417