Work Engagement, Psychological Capital, and Employee Performance: The Mediating Role of Employee Well-Being in the Banking Industry
Abstract
The banking industry increasingly requires employees who can sustain performance amid digital transformation, service pressure, and stricter operational targets. This study examines the influence of work engagement and psychological capital on employee performance, with employee well-being as a mediating variable at PT Bank Tabungan Negara (Persero) Tbk. A quantitative explanatory design was applied using survey data from 64 employees selected through simple random sampling. Data were collected using a structured five-point Likert questionnaire and analyzed through validity and reliability tests, classical assumption tests, multiple linear regression, and Sobel mediation testing using SPSS. The results show that work engagement significantly affects employee well-being (b = 0.312, p = 0.001) and employee performance (b = 0.298, p = 0.001). Psychological capital also significantly affects employee well-being (b = 0.298, p = 0.002) and employee performance (b = 0.276, p = 0.002). Employee well-being significantly improves employee performance (b = 0.421, p < 0.001) and partially mediates both relationships. These findings emphasize that employee performance can be strengthened by developing engagement, psychological capital, and workplace well-being as integrated human resource strategies.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Avey, J. B., Reichard, R. J., Luthans, F., & Mhatre, K. H. (2011). Meta-analysis of the impact of positive psychological capital on employee attitudes, behaviors, and performance. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 22(2), 127–152. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrdq.20070
Bakker, A. B. (2022). The social psychology of work engagement: State of the field. Career Development International, 27(1), 36–53. https://doi.org/10.1108/CDI-08-2021-0213
Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2017). Job demands-resources theory: Taking stock and looking forward. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 22(3), 273–285. https://doi.org/10.1037/ocp0000056
DeHaan, C. R., Bradshaw, E. L., Diaz-Castillo, S., Trautman, T. C., Rigby, C. S., & Ryan, R. M. (2024). Energy in the workplace: Job demands, job resources, and employees’ inner resources as pathways to organizational outcomes. Frontiers in Psychology, 15, 1413901. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1413901
Fisher, C. D. (2010). Happiness at work. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12(4), 384–412. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2009.00270.x
Galanakis, M. D., & Tsitouri, E. (2022). Positive psychology in the working environment. Job demands-resources theory, work engagement and burnout: A systematic literature review. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 1022102. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1022102
Gutiérrez, O. I., Polo, J. D., Zambrano, M. J., & Molina, D. C. (2020). Meta-analysis and scientific mapping of well-being and job performance. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 23, e43. https://doi.org/10.1017/SJP.2020.40
Liu, J., Xu, R., & Wang, Z. (2024). The effects of psychological capital, work engagement, and job autonomy on job performance in platform flexible employees. Scientific Reports, 14(1), 18434. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-69484-3
Loghman, S., Quinn, M., Dawkins, S., Woods, M., Om Sharma, S., & Scott, J. (2023). A comprehensive meta-analyses of the nomological network of psychological capital (PsyCap). Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 30(1), 108-128. https://doi.org/10.1177/15480518221107998
Lorenz, T., Hagitte, L., & Prasath, P. R. (2022). Validation of the revised Compound PsyCap Scale (CPC-12R) and its measurement invariance across the US and Germany. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 1075031. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1075031
Luthans, F., & Youssef-Morgan, C. M. (2017). Psychological capital: An evidence-based positive approach. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 4, 339-366. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032516-113324
Luthans, F., Avolio, B. J., Avey, J. B., & Norman, S. M. (2007). Positive psychological capital: Measurement and relationship with performance and satisfaction. Personnel Psychology, 60(3), 541-572. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2007.00083.x
Martadiani, A. A. M., Setini, M., Asih, D., & Wiradarma, M. P. S. (2026). Tri Hita Karana as a moderator of HPWS, engagement, and turnover intention in Bali hospitals. International Journal of Applied Business & International Management, 11(1), 86–102. https://doi.org/10.32535/ijabim.v11i1.4348
Martela, F., Gómez, M., Unanue, W., Araya, S., Bravo, D., & Espejo, A. (2021). What makes work meaningful? Longitudinal evidence for the importance of autonomy and beneficence for meaningful work. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 131, 103631. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2021.103631
Mazzetti, G., Robledo, E., Vignoli, M., Topa, G., Guglielmi, D., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2023). Work engagement: A meta-analysis using the job demands-resources model. Psychological Reports, 126(3), 1069-1107. https://doi.org/10.1177/00332941211051988
Mohyi, A., Budi, A. S., Malik, N., & Tarman, M. (2024). The employees’ well-being as a mediator of work stress and job insecurity influences on health workers’ performance during Covid-19 pandemic era. International Journal of Applied Business & International Management, 9(1), 30–44. https://doi.org/10.32535/ijabim.v9i1.2945
Momin, M. M., & Rolla, K. P. (2026). Well-being, parity and decent work: A meta-analytic review of psychological capital and employee well-being literature. Management Research Review, 49(2), 234-252. https://doi.org/10.1108/MRR-05-2025-0411
National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH). (2021). NIOSH worker well-being questionnaire (WellBQ). Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/docs/2021-110/
Neuber, L., Englitz, C., Schulte, N., Forthmann, B., & Holling, H. (2022). How work engagement relates to performance and absenteeism: A meta-analysis. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 31(2), 292-315. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2021.1953989
Ng, C., Wider, W., Yang, C., Jiang, L., Vasudevan, A., Bhandari, P., & Lee, H. P. T. (2024). Keys factor affecting employee performance in the banking sector: a Delphi study. Cogent Business & Management, 11(1), 2409942. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2024.2409942
Nguyen-Duc, T., Nguyen, L. P., Phuong, T. T., Nguyen, H. T. H., & Cao, V. T. H. (2024). Validation of individual work performance questionnaire in a Vietnamese context. European Journal of Training and Development, 48(9), 896-916. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJTD-03-2023-0034
Orgambídez, A., Borrego, Y., Cantero?Sánchez, F. J., & León?Pérez, J. M. (2025). Relationship between psychological capital and nursing burnout: A systematic review and meta?analysis. International Nursing Review, 72(3), e13072. https://doi.org/10.1111/inr.13072
Peiró, J. M., Kozusznik, M. W., Rodríguez-Molina, I., & Tordera, N. (2019). The happy-productive worker model and beyond: Patterns of wellbeing and performance at work. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(3), 479. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16030479
Platania, S., Morando, M., Gruttadauria, S. V., & Koopmans, L. (2023). The individual work performance questionnaire: Psychometric properties of the Italian version. European Journal of Investigation in Health, Psychology and Education, 14(1), 49-63. https://doi.org/10.3390/ejihpe14010004
Schaufeli, W. B., Shimazu, A., Hakanen, J., Salanova, M., & De Witte, H. (2017). An ultra-short measure for work engagement: The UWES-3 validation across five countries. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 35(4), 577–591. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000430
Sinval, J., Pasian, S., Queirós, C., & Marôco, J. (2018). Brazil-Portugal transcultural adaptation of the UWES-9: Internal consistency, dimensionality, and measurement invariance. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 353. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00353
Szerdahelyi, M., Paterson, T. A., Huang, L., Martos, T., & Komlósi, L. (2024). Validation of the PCQ-5: A short form to measure state positive psychological capital. Group & Organization Management, 49(1), 215-245. https://doi.org/10.1177/10596011221127383
Wijngaards, I., King, O. C., Burger, M. J., & van Exel, J. (2022). Worker Well-Being: What it Is, and how it Should Be Measured: I. Wijngaards et al. Applied Research in Quality of Life, 17(2), 795-832. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11482-021-09930-w
Yao, J., Qiu, X., Yang, L., Han, X., & Li, Y. (2022). The relationship between work engagement and job performance: Psychological capital as a moderating factor. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 729131. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.729131
Zuama, M., Sudiardhita, I. K. R., & Wolor, C. W. (2023). Leadership determination and training effectiveness on employee performance through work motivation mediation. International Journal of Applied Business and International Management, 8(1), 113–127. https://doi.org/10.32535/ijabim.v8i1.2132
DOI: https://doi.org/10.32535/ijabim.v10i3.4618
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2026 Resty Ismawanti, Imas Komariyah, Yudi Wahyudin Suwandi

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
International Journal of Applied Business and International Management (IJABIM)
ISSN 2614-7432 (Print) | ISSN 2621-2862 (Online)
DOI Prefix: 10.32535 by CrossRef
Published by AIBPM Publisher
JL. Kawi No. 23, Bareng, Kec. Klojen, Kota Malang, Jawa Timur, Indonesia
Email: journal.ijabim@gmail.com
Phone: +62 341 366222
Website: https://aibpmpublisher.com/
Governed by
Association of International Business and Professional Management
Email: admin@aibpm.org
Website: https://www.aibpm.org/
Licensing Information
The International Journal of Applied Business and International Management (IJABIM) is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License .









